© Copyright Acquisition International 2025 - All Rights Reserved.

Article Image - Avoiding the merger control blues
Posted 19th June 2018

Avoiding the merger control blues

Effective handling of antitrust issues can help businesses bolster their negotiating position—whichever side of the deal they're on.

Mouse Scroll AnimationScroll to keep reading

Let us help promote your business to a wider following.

Avoiding the merger control blues
Image

Avoiding the merger control blues

Patrick Sarch, Partner, and Sophie Sahlin, Counsel, at White & Case

Effective handling of antitrust issues can help businesses bolster their negotiating position—whichever side of the deal they’re on.

Delays or derailment of a deal by merger control considerations can significantly impact the commercial returns for both parties. But there are a number of steps that businesses can take to mitigate the risk.

Avoid unnecessary ‘triggering events’

In the majority of jurisdictions, a filing is triggered only if there is a ‘change in control’, meaning that a party acquires de jure or de facto joint or sole control over the target. Typically, the acquirer obtains sole control if it alone can decide on strategic matters, such as the budget, business plan, major investments and appointment/removal of senior management. The acquirer would obtain joint control if it can block such decisions (‘veto rights’).

There would be no change in control if the acquirer obtains a non-controlling minority stake in the target company or if the transaction results in ‘shifting alliances’, where each strategic decision is approved by a different combination of shareholders.

Some jurisdictions, however, have chosen to create additional ‘triggering events’ that may cover situations in which an acquirer is not seeking control. For example, the acquisition of a certain percentage of shares or votes in a company constitutes a notifiable transaction in a number of jurisdictions, such as Austria, Germany and Brazil.

In a minority of jurisdictions, a transaction constitutes a notifiable transaction where the acquirer obtains some form of ‘material influence’, but less than control. In Germany, for instance, the acquisition of the ‘ability to exercise competitively significant influence’ constitutes a notifiable transaction. This provision is triggered when the acquisition of less than a 25 per cent stake is accompanied by so-called ‘plus factors’, such as information rights, the right to appoint board members or certain blocking rights. Although not very commonly used, this provision is relevant where the investor is a strategic acquirer with stakes in competing businesses.

Delays caused by notifiable transactions can significantly impact the commercial returns for both parties. Therefore, it may be more commercially attractive to structure the deal to ensure that there is no triggering event. However, it’s important to ensure that the structure and deal documentation reflects the parties’ true intentions, as competition authorities will assess the economic reality of the transaction and consider whether a situation may give rise to de facto control.

Make use of a put and call option agreement

Entering into a put and call option agreement allows the parties to postpone a filing obligation up to the moment in time when the option is exercised, and where a filing obligation may no longer interfere with deal imperatives or competitive conditions may have changed.

There are two scenarios in which such a move could delay timings of aspects of the transaction that may lead to trigger events: where an acquirer is attempting to purchase multiple businesses; and where an acquirer is looking at a large business that can be carved up to be acquired in stages. In the first of these scenarios, acquirers may wish to combine two similar or complementary targets to create synergies, which can give rise to antitrust scrutiny.

Even if the transactions are undertaken separately (i.e., no mutual conditionality) such that separate filings are triggered, both sets of competition authorities (which may or may not be the same) will review the combination if the transactions run in parallel (i.e., simultaneous closing). Even if they are sequential but overlap to some extent, such that the competition authorities reviewing the second of the two transactions would review the combination, the combination would in practice impact the review by the first set of authorities (in particular if the same authorities review both transactions). This could delay closing of both deals, which can put an acquirer at a disadvantage notably in a competitive bidding context. The acquirer would therefore have to balance two potentially conflicting priorities: ensuring that it signs both deals to realise the envisaged synergies, while not jeopardising its chances of signing each one of them because of the implications the combination may have on the process.

One way to manage this balancing act is to proceed with the more pressing deal first and agree on a put and call option on the second deal. Provided that the second seller is willing to wait, the potentially problematic combination is not reviewed until the acquirer exercises the option, which allows the acquirer to put forward a competitive offer for the first deal while securing both deals.

Where the acquirer is looking at one target which alone gives rise to competition issues, it may be possible to acquire part of the business (for example, one manufacturing plant) or a minority stake initially, alongside a put and call option for the remainder of the business. At the point that the acquirer decides to exercise the option, competitive conditions may have changed or the parties could have used the longer lead time to develop remedies to tackle the authorities’ scrutiny.

When exercising staggered acquisitions of several parts of a business involving the same acquirer and seller in the EU, even for acquisitions which are not mutually conditional, extra caution needs to be taken. Even if each individual acquisition would not trigger any filing obligations because the revenue of each part does not hit the filing thresholds, all the staggered transactions involving the same acquirer and seller over a period of two years’ time would become notifiable with the most recent acquisition, if one or several of the transactions taken alone or together triggers the revenue filing thresholds.

Offer an up-front carve-out or remedies

If a merger filing is required and it is expected to give rise to in-depth scrutiny, the acquirer can ensure that competition concerns are addressed up-front to avoid slowing down the overall process.

The parties can carve out assets likely to be causes of concern to the authorities before launching the transaction. However, it must be made clear to the authorities reviewing the transaction that the carved out assets will not fall within the scope of the main transaction nor their review. The authorities will also want to satisfy themselves that the problematic assets have indeed been carved out before the main transaction closes.

An alternative to an up-front carve out is up-front remedies, where the parties offer a comprehensive and clear-cut remedy package in Phase 1 to avoid going through the lengthy and in-depth review of a Phase 2 investigation.

Categories: Legal, M&A


You Might Also Like
Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
5 Borrowing Options for Low or No Credit Score
Finance
30/05/20235 Borrowing Options for Low or No Credit Score

In today’s inflationary periods, being in dire need of additional funds are inevitable. However, accessing them is no picnic since most financial companies will require borrowers to have good credit.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
AI in Action_ Pioneering Business Changes in 2023
News
15/09/2023AI in Action_ Pioneering Business Changes in 2023

The outset of 2023 heralds a renewed phase in business metamorphosis, one steered by Artificial Intelligence. The contemporary era bears testimony to AI’s escalating significance, molding enterprises in unprecedented manners. Principal Insights In the en

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Cloud Pioneer Liaison Technologies Launches Industry’s First dPaaS
Innovation
02/04/2015Cloud Pioneer Liaison Technologies Launches Industry’s First dPaaS

Liaison Technologies, the industry-recognized leader in cloud-based integration and data management offerings, today announced the availability of the Liaison Alloy Platform™, the industry's first dPaaS (Data Platform as a Service) solution.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
New Chairman Appointed to Lead Balfour Beatty Board
Finance
12/02/2015New Chairman Appointed to Lead Balfour Beatty Board

Balfour Beatty, the international infrastructure group is pleased to announce that Philip Aiken will join the Board as non-executive Chairman with effect from 26 March 2015.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
7 Ways To Grow Wealth by Saving Money on Everyday Expenses
News
06/04/20227 Ways To Grow Wealth by Saving Money on Everyday Expenses

When we spend money day-to-day, we rarely focus our efforts on saving money here and there. Most people buy without a conscious effort to save for the future. However, if you take a few steps to save money gradually on everyday expenses and purchases, it will

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Is Your Retail Job Safe? What AI and ChatGPT Mean for the Retail Industry
Innovation
01/03/2023Is Your Retail Job Safe? What AI and ChatGPT Mean for the Retail Industry

ChatGPT, the new AI-powered chatbot, is set to revolutionise the way we work. The chatbot uses natural language processing (NLP) to generate high-quality, human-like responses upon user request, making it one of the most innovative and influential AI systems t

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
IPC Strikes Strategic Partnership With Trusted Data Solutions
M&A
29/10/2019IPC Strikes Strategic Partnership With Trusted Data Solutions

IPC, a leading global provider of secure, compliant communications and networking solutions for the financial markets community, today announced a strategic partnership with Trusted Data Solutions (TDS), an expert in mobile voice recording solutions, complianc

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Growth in UK M&A Appetite – a Risky Business?
Innovation
29/02/2016Growth in UK M&A Appetite – a Risky Business?

KPMG forecasts published in September 2015 projected that appetite for M&A deals in the UK over the next 12 months would outstrip both the US and the rest of Europe (with appetite in the UK.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Entertainment and Media: The Speeding Edge of the Digital Revolution Package
Innovation
19/10/2015Entertainment and Media: The Speeding Edge of the Digital Revolution Package

Founded in 2014, Dunaud Clarenc Combles & Associes brings together private and public experience and a culture of industry expertise and customised consulting, with an identity and a reputation formed through our work in the areas of litigation, institutional



Our Trusted Brands

Acquisition International is a flagship brand of AI Global Media. AI Global Media is a B2B enterprise and are committed to creating engaging content allowing businesses to market their services to a larger global audience. We have 14 unique brands, each of which serves a specific industry or region. Each brand covers the latest news in its sector and publishes a digital magazine and newsletter which is read by a global audience.

Arrow