© Copyright Acquisition International 2025 - All Rights Reserved.

Article Image - AI Content Conundrum: Sentiment Degradation Exacerbating the Misinformation Age
Posted 13th May 2024

AI Content Conundrum: Sentiment Degradation Exacerbating the Misinformation Age

With industries across the board becoming increasingly adept at using AI-driven Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude2 and Meta AI’s Llama2, it begs one obvious question: How do we make sure all of the content out there isn’t generated by AI?

Mouse Scroll AnimationScroll to keep reading

Let us help promote your business to a wider following.

AI Content Conundrum: Sentiment Degradation Exacerbating the Misinformation Age
Content

Study: Generative AI content detection authority reveals clandestine content threat, cites impacts and implications

By Merilee Kern, MBA

With industries across the board becoming increasingly adept at using AI-driven Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude2 and Meta AI’s Llama2, it begs one obvious question: How do we make sure all of the content out there isn’t generated by AI?

So severe the concern over AI-induced mis- and disinformation, the World Economic Forum (WEF) named these concerns in its Global Risks Report 2024, which warns of a “global risks landscape in which progress in human development is being chipped away slowly, leaving states and individuals vulnerable to new and resurgent risks.” In the report, Carolina Klint, Chief Commercial Officer, Europe, Marsh McLennan, underscored that “Artificial intelligence breakthroughs will radically disrupt the risk outlook for organizations with many struggling to react to threats arising from misinformation, disintermediation and strategic miscalculation.”

Fortunately, being an “AI sleuth” is relatively easy thanks to some emerging smart SaaS tools. Such solutions will become crucial for those endeavoring to identify the use of AI in content creation, dealing with challenges related to false positives in AI content detection, discerning if AI material has yet been detected, and even if AI “distilled” content has been reconfigured to be more neutral in sentiment.

In fact, to that latter point of original content being watered down or repositioned to a more impartial format that does not accurately reflect the originator’s voice or purpose—whether that be intended or unintended outcome of the spin—one study has revealed how pervasive this is along with the implications related thereto. This as Originality.ai—a 99% accurate AI content, plagiarism and fact checker SaaS assuring publishing with integrity—released its findings that some of the most popular LLMs used to rewrite or paraphrase another text are making content more neutral in sentiment and, in doing so, are notably altering the nature and objective of the initial written work.

To better understand and consider the possible consequences of such AI-driven content transformation relative to tone, temperament and overall sentiment, I connected with Originality.ai Founder and CEO Jonathan Gillham for some insight into the study along with implications of the disconcerting findings it revealed.

MK: Your study found that popular LLMs like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude2 and Meta AI’s Llama2 are officially making content more neutral in sentiment. Why does this actually matter?

JG: Employing LLMs to rewrite or paraphrase another text can certainly offer speed and ease in content production, but it comes with caveats. For example, there might be a sound reason for coverage of a news event to have highly negative or positive sentiment. Dampening those qualities might prevent readers from perceiving how potentially troublesome or heartening an event might be. Outside of news content, publishers might desire to convey a particular kind of sentiment to evoke feelings in readers, and a neutral-scoring story might struggle to do so. On the other hand, there could be uses for making texts with more neutral sentiment that read more like “just the facts.” Publishers might want to consider the tone and purpose of a piece and know that LLMs might modify texts in ways that affect those goals.

MK: What exactly is sentiment analysis, which was the benchmark employed for your AI Paraphrased Content study?

JG: Sentiment analysis is the process of analyzing and categorizing texts as positive, neutral or negative, and to what degree. It’s often used to assess opinions and feelings expressed in reviews or open-ended questions in surveys. Many of the stories in this study had sentiment made more neutral after generative AI rewrote them. In the Sentiment Analysis scale, 1 is highly negative, 5 is highly positive and 3 is neutral. LLMs tended to move a story’s sentiment closer to 3, whether the original writing was more negative or positive. In the aggregate, the rewritten articles had their sentiment flattened.

MK: How was the study methodology undertaken and what were some of the specific key findings and data points?

JG: We analyzed 100 articles for their sentiment, or how positive or negative they were, and then had them rewritten by three Large Language Models: OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude2 and Meta AI’s Llama2. The new texts’ sentiment scores were then analyzed for any changes. The 100 articles utilized in the study, each from popular websites, were rated by Sapien.IO’s Sentiment Analysis for how positive, neutral or negative each was. We then had three different LLMs—ChatGPT, Claude2 and Llama2, specifically—each paraphrase the article and then analyze the sentiment of the new text. These ratings were then compared to the original article’s sentiment rating. The score given, along with each rewritten article’s word count, was analyzed for any relationships.


The key findings include the substantiation that LLM rewrites moved the sentiment scores closer to the middle, neutral part of the scale and that the resulting sentiment scores differed by LLM. Llama2 had the most positive orientation scores, with Claude2 having the most negative. It’s also important to note that rewritten articles were made shorter than the original, which could be part of the reason sentiment scores changed.

‍Overall, the analysis showed no more than half a point in difference between the original articles’ average Sentiment Analysis score of 2.54 (slightly more negative than neutral) and the LLMs’ rewrite averages of 2.72 (Claude2), 2.95 (ChatGPT) and 3.08 (Llama2). However, those differences became pronounced when looking at articles that originally held sentiment scores of 1 or 5. In those cases, the rewrites differed by more than a point and up to 1.5 points on average, pulling toward a neutral 3. If the original scored a 1, the rewrites averaged 2.35. When the original was a 5, the rewrites averaged 3.56.

MK: You mentioned that the LLM rewrites often resulted in fewer words and that this could have impacted the results. Can you elaborate a bit on that?

JG: Yes, a possible explanation for the neutralization in sentiment could be that all three LLMs reduced the number of words when they rewrote articles. Claude2 reduced words by a notable 43.5%, compared to 13.5% for ChatGPT and 15.6% for Llama2. While shortening an article can be desirable for some purposes, the reduction might eliminate details or potent phrases that indicate how negative or positive the sentiment of the story is. Losing those details or descriptive words could explain part of the movement toward a rating of 3, neutral, for stories with either the most positive or negative sentiment.

This study was small, but the data displayed suggests a slightly positive correlation between sentiment scores and word counts, with longer texts receiving higher scores. The trend was highlighted by comparing the three LLMs to each other. Across all levels of sentiment in the original articles, Claude2 consistently had both the lowest sentiment scores and the lowest word count, while Llama2 had the highest sentiment scores and highest word count.

MK: How pervasive do you feel the issue of AI-generated content is becoming?

JG: Some of our other research has looked at large companies that dominate Google search results. These include Valnet, Arena Group, Cande Nast,  Red Ventures and DotDashMeredith, among others. Our analysis shows that 46% of major publishers are using AI for content creation. This includes seven out of the 16 companies we’ve studied, with significant AI content detected on their sites. On one particular globally popular sports magazine site, an article was identified by Futurism as being penned by a “fake” author, which our algorithm substantiated. This is a tactic being increasingly used for a content marketing strategy called “parasite SEO,” where reputable domains host content—even wholly AI created—primarily for search engine ranking purposes. Of course, for readers of such content expecting a human was at the helm, this kind of gratuitous and unimpassioned information propagation, especially that with extreme reach, can be disheartening.

According to Axios, “By some estimates, AI-generated content could soon account for 99% or more of all information on the internet, further straining already overwhelmed content moderation systems…Dozens of ‘news sites’ filled with machine generated content of dubious quality have already cropped up, with far more likely to follow—and some media sites are helping blur the lines.” 

University of Washington professor Kate Starbird, an expert in the field, told Axios that generative AI will deepen the misinformation problem in numerous ways. “Generative AI has the potential to accelerate the spread of both mis- and disinformation, and exacerbate the ongoing challenge of finding information we can trust online,” she said.

With other reports indicating that a vast majority—over 75%—of consumers are reportedly concerned about AI-driven misinformation, content sentiment degradation is emerging as an insidious facet of that overarching threat. Although it is a more stealth and less considered offense, the restructuring of content in a way that mitigates, or outright eliminates, the intended emotional tonality—the humanity—of a text is exacerbating the Misinformation Age of AI.

Categories: Innovation, News


You Might Also Like
Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Mediation & Dispute Resolution – the Holistic Approach
Innovation
13/02/2017Mediation & Dispute Resolution – the Holistic Approach

Vanessa Lloyd Platt tells us about her firm, its innovative approach, and what sets it aside from the competition.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
What Type of Compensation Can You Seek After a Car Accident?
Legal
20/06/2023What Type of Compensation Can You Seek After a Car Accident?

If you are injured in a car accident, you could claim compensation. Here are the different types of compensation that you may be able to seek.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Silverfleet Acquires Coventya From Equistone
Finance
29/03/2016Silverfleet Acquires Coventya From Equistone

Silverfleet Capital, the European Private Equity firm specialised in buy-to-build, has agreed to acquire a majority stake in Coventya from Equistone Partners Europe Limited for an undisclosed sum.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Mergers and Acquisitions Gain Momentum in European Medical Device Sector
M&A
14/04/2015Mergers and Acquisitions Gain Momentum in European Medical Device Sector

The contribution of US buyers to M&As in Europe is expected to increase, finds Frost & Sullivan.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
An Inclusive Approach
Legal
08/10/2021An Inclusive Approach

When Perez & Barros Sociedade de Advogados was established in 2018, it was designed to reflect the needs of the day, drawing on modern, customized and ethical legal services. In three years, their efforts have been rewarded with success in 2021’s Global

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Empowering Women in Finance and Demystifying the Landscape As Saxo Sees 57% Surge in Female Clients Following Lower Pricing Strategy
Finance
07/03/2024Empowering Women in Finance and Demystifying the Landscape As Saxo Sees 57% Surge in Female Clients Following Lower Pricing Strategy

As the financial sphere continues to be rocked by the effects of lockdowns, subsequent supply chain disruptions, an energy crisis and the long-forgotten notion of inflation, Camilla Dahl Hansen, Chief Experience Officer at Saxo Bank, argues now is the time to

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Business Insurance and the Essential Coverage Types
News
27/10/2021Business Insurance and the Essential Coverage Types

General liability coverage is required for everyone. If you own a small business, it's your livelihood and should be well protected. You must purchase beyond required workers' compensation and general liability to ensure that you are fully protected against al

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Innovation in Biotechnology – Biotech Top 50
Innovation
31/07/2016Innovation in Biotechnology – Biotech Top 50

Kimal® are a developer, manufacturer and supplier of customised procedure packs and vascular access devices for use across a wide variety of clinical departments including cardiology, radiology, critical care, anaesthesia, laparoscopy, and cardiac surgery.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Best for Litigation Support Services – France
Finance
20/05/2016Best for Litigation Support Services – France

As the fifth largest auditing and advisory network, BDO’s core business clients are mid-sized companies.



Our Trusted Brands

Acquisition International is a flagship brand of AI Global Media. AI Global Media is a B2B enterprise and are committed to creating engaging content allowing businesses to market their services to a larger global audience. We have 14 unique brands, each of which serves a specific industry or region. Each brand covers the latest news in its sector and publishes a digital magazine and newsletter which is read by a global audience.

Arrow