© Copyright Acquisition International 2025 - All Rights Reserved.

Article Image - Creating Collaborative Business Outcomes: Why Tech and Finance Leaders Should Unite During the M&A Process
Posted 8th April 2025

Creating Collaborative Business Outcomes: Why Tech and Finance Leaders Should Unite During the M&A Process

In any competitive marketplace there are lots of drivers for companies to merge and acquire each other. Sometimes it’s about expanding market reach by tapping into markets that a competitor has better footings in, or it could be about being better positioned to succeed against bigger competitors.

Mouse Scroll AnimationScroll to keep reading

Let us help promote your business to a wider following.

Creating Collaborative Business Outcomes: Why Tech and Finance Leaders Should Unite During the M&A Process
Chessboard with chess pieces and wooden blocks with the word mergers and acquisitions

By David Tyler, Founder and Director of Outlier Technology

In any competitive marketplace there are lots of drivers for companies to merge and acquire each other. Sometimes it’s about expanding market reach by tapping into markets that a competitor has better footings in, or it could be about being better positioned to succeed against bigger competitors. 

The benefits are very often easy to explain, from cost savings and removing duplicate teams, processes or capabilities to driving economies of scale associated with higher production rates. 

But the stakes are high and none of these benefits are guaranteed. All businesses are unique – even franchises and chains – because of the people, the customers, geography, laws, timing and all manner of other constraints, meaning the process of merging businesses is not at all straightforward. 

It’s easy to get caught in the trap of believing that if two companies work in closely related fields, use technology from the same vendors and follow the same legal requirements for accounting and financial practices, that merging their operations should be straight forward. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth. 

M&A teams will be formed on both sides, and external advisors will be brought in to help with the process, but very often people’s eyes are firmly fixed on the commercial prize – the upside, the potential, the excitement. 

Integrating processes and systems is very often given a back seat in the process. It’s something that rears its head after the deal is done, and that’s where the uncomfortable truths start to appear: those systems from the same vendor have been configured completely differently by both companies, and the processes they support are totally incompatible.  At this point, the costs of integration can easily skyrocket because we’re no longer talking about reconfiguring some systems or tweaking some processes, we’re talking about complete and fundamental change to how one or both organisations operate. And that was never part of the acquisition plan! 

This sounds almost too absurd to be true, but it happens more often than many would like to admit.  Technical and operational due diligence are some of the easiest cans to kick down the road, but the impact of getting it wrong can be massive. The level of risk being ignored can be huge and it can mean the difference between being able to recognise those commercial benefits or not. 

That’s exactly what happened following a $10 billion deal which saw Goldcorp Inc acquired by Newmont Mining Corp. The newly formed Newmont Corporation became one of the world’s largest gold producers. But SAP Insights reports that the acquisition was soon beset with problems, including multiple duplicate and different IT systems that somehow had to be combined, as well as varying cybersecurity policies which increased exposure to risk for the new company. 

An early tech focus 

What if things were different? What if the M&A processes brought technology leaders to the table at the earliest opportunity, to work in partnership with the rest of the deal team? 

This would enable them to undertake a thorough assessment of the existing technology resources across both companies, including all of the policies and processes, the hardware and software used by both, and the skills of the people within each department.  While it takes more time, it’s time well spent. 

In many cases these are some of the biggest transactions companies will ever do – far bigger than any individual client deal or property purchase, so using tools like targeted PoCs to identify fundamental issues with compatibility of systems as early in the deal as possible will pay dividends. 

Being able to assess the work involved in creating unified cyber security policies, training plans for staff who will need to use new technology, how to rationalise and consolidate cloud and on-premise technologies – these are all critically important to successful integration. 

Ultimately it’s about being realistic, honest and responsible about what is achievable and what the costs are likely to be.  And those assessments need to be given the weight and importance they deserve in the deal making process. 

It’s a concept supported by the BCS, the Chartered Institute for IT, which states: “In order for the merger to be a success, IT leadership needs to be involved earlier in the M&A journey to better equip organisations in realising success earlier and at a lower cost.” 

When tech becomes a stumbling block 

We don’t have to look very far to find examples of M&A deals falling apart quite dramatically.  And it’s not just about financial penalties – there can be serious regulatory, reputational and even political impact when things go wrong.  

When Banco Sabadell bought TSB, customer bank records were moved on to a new system – a project costing £450 million which was expected to save £160 million a year. But the process was rushed and the technical due diligence was largely skipped. The result was customers locked out of their online accounts for days unable to pay their bills, not to mention being able to see other customers’ accounts. These issues cost TSB Chief Executive Paul Pester his job and added more than £176 million in costs to the acquisition deal in compensation, lost income and additional resources (Raconteur). 

Sprint hoped their $35 billion majority stake acquisition of Nextel Communications would help them become the third largest telecommunications provider in the US at the time.  The upside was clear – gaining access to each other’s customer bases would see both companies grow exponentially. However, the two companies had no overlaps in terms of the technology – their networks were fundamentally incompatible, making it incredibly difficult to merge operations and resulting in a huge market share loss (M&A Science).  

But it’s not always like that.  One example where technology teams had been consulted early in the process was the proposed acquisition of the Williams & Glyn bank branch network by Santander. The technology teams found that ‘unpicking the existing technology’ was simply too complex, and the whole deal was halted (Raconteur). Whilst it was no doubt a blow to those who’d spent time and money on investigating the feasibility of the deal, it would ultimately have much more costly had they not stopped the process at that point and proceeded without realising the tech issues they were facing.  

This is a rare case of technical and operational experts being given the time, understanding and priority to make an honest assessment – this assessment revealed the problems involved which put a stop to a potentially disastrous deal. 

How to avoid the pitfalls 

While the process may not be simple, the concept of mitigating risks surrounding merging technologies is straightforward enough.  But to mitigate or accept a risk, you have to know it exists and then understand it: this is what due diligence is for. We’re more than comfortable performing financial due diligence, so adding technical due diligence shouldn’t be an alien concept. 

Technical leaders need to be given time and resources to identify risks and consolidation opportunities and, once you have the results of their investigations coming back, they need to be taken seriously.  

History has shown us time after time, once the deal has been signed and the process of merging the two companies, or assimilating one company into the other, has begun, it’s too late to highlight any red flags which may have stopped the M&A process had they been discovered before the ink on the contract dried. 

David Tyler

Categories: Finance, M&A, News, Technology


You Might Also Like
Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Herkules Capital Acquisition of Shares in Linas Matkasse
Finance
04/08/2015Herkules Capital Acquisition of Shares in Linas Matkasse

Herkules Capital Acquisition of Shares in Linas Matkasse

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Innovative, Practical, Cost-Effective Forklifts
News
18/07/2022Innovative, Practical, Cost-Effective Forklifts

TASK Forklifts designs, engineers and manufactures a range of pedestrian walkie stackers for the materials handling industry. Acquisition International magazine has recognised the company for its award in Most Outstanding Forklifts Manufacturer 2022 – Austra

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Coronavirus Crisis Fuels Strong Performance of Technology Sectors but Growth Should Accelerate Post Lockdown
Innovation
16/07/2020Coronavirus Crisis Fuels Strong Performance of Technology Sectors but Growth Should Accelerate Post Lockdown

The huge increase in expenditure on products and services from innovative technology sectors during the Coronavirus crisis could rise dramatically as restrictions lift and societies and economies begin to return to some form of normality. This is because busin

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
The Secret to Success? Find a Trusted Business Advisor
News
08/09/2023The Secret to Success? Find a Trusted Business Advisor

Starting a business is a bit like hiking up a mountain blindfolded – it’s difficult, disorienting, and you never know what unexpected cliffs or pitfalls await around the next bend. The stakes feel high, and one wrong step can send you tumbling. But

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Tips for Students: Leadership Qualities That Are Important to Business
Leadership
04/09/2020Tips for Students: Leadership Qualities That Are Important to Business

You might have heard the saying that a leader can’t be created, they are only born that way. This can’t be further from the truth as almost everyone can become a leader.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Liquid Finance Receives Line of Credit From Shawbrook
Finance
21/04/2015Liquid Finance Receives Line of Credit From Shawbrook

Liquid Finance Partnership Ltd (LFPL), a leader in the Merchant Cash Advance sector of the fast growing Alternative Funding market, today announced the establishment of a line of credit with Shawbrook Asset Finance, a division of Shawbrook Bank.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Browne Jacobson advises LDC on £25m Aspin Group investment
Finance
14/05/2015Browne Jacobson advises LDC on £25m Aspin Group investment

Browne Jacobson advises LDC on £25m Aspin Group investment.

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
A Spotlight on Insolvency & Restructuring
Legal
05/10/2015A Spotlight on Insolvency & Restructuring

Solomon Harris was founded in 1998 by Managing Partner Sophia Harris. With offices in central George Town, the capital of the Cayman Islands, and Zurich, Switzerland, the firm offers cost effective legal advice to both local and international clients wishing t

Read Full PostRead - Eye Icon
Insurers Set to Embrace Wearable Technologies
Finance
05/05/2015Insurers Set to Embrace Wearable Technologies

Nearly two-thirds of insurers expect wearable technologies to have a significant impact on their industry, according to a survey of more than 200 insurance executives as part of Accenture’s annual Technology Vision report.



Our Trusted Brands

Acquisition International is a flagship brand of AI Global Media. AI Global Media is a B2B enterprise and are committed to creating engaging content allowing businesses to market their services to a larger global audience. We have 14 unique brands, each of which serves a specific industry or region. Each brand covers the latest news in its sector and publishes a digital magazine and newsletter which is read by a global audience.

Arrow